CompanyCam alternative
Built for job sites. You are running events.
CompanyCam is a serious product and contractors rely on it. It is also built around a job, priced per person, and sold to a trade that is not yours. If you are a brand team collecting photos at events, both of those matter.
Being fair about it
CompanyCam is genuinely good at its job.
Photos tied to a project, timestamped, annotated, defensible months later in a dispute. If you need a documentation record, use it. We do not do that and we are not going to pretend otherwise.
The per-seat price is the real difference.
Their published Pro plan starts at $79 a month covering three users, then $29 per extra user on annual billing or $34 month to month. That is fine when every seat is a crew member billing hours. It is punishing when the people you want on the app are part-time staff working one night.
Side by side
The differences that actually change your week.
| CompanyCam | Team Capture | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Contractors documenting a job | Brand and marketing teams at events |
| Organised around | A project or property | An event, and the season it belongs to |
| Pricing | Per person, per month | Flat per workspace, never per person |
| A 25-person team | $717 a month on annual billing, more month to month | $99 a month |
| Part-time and casual staff | Each one costs another seat | Included in the band, adding somebody on the night costs nothing |
| What you get out | Job documentation and reports | Full-resolution originals to publish |
Checked against public information on 21 August 2026.
Where it stops working
You want everyone shooting, not a chosen few.
The moment a tool charges per head, somebody decides who does not get it, and those are exactly the photos you wanted. Our price does not move when you add the whole team.
Your unit of work is a night, not a property.
Albums are events. A launch, a game day, a tasting. Set the year up in one sitting.
You are publishing, not proving.
The output is a full-resolution original headed for a feed or a print ad, not a record for a claim.
Which one you want
If it has to hold up in a dispute, use CompanyCam.
If a photo has to hold up as evidence about a job, CompanyCam is the right tool. If the photos are going out on your channels next week and half your shooters are part-time, the per-seat price is buying you something you do not need.
Request accessRelated
Who asks this question
Collecting photos across every location
Every location runs events and shoots them. Head office sees almost none of it. Team Capture collects each location into the same workspace.
Read itPhoto collection for agencies running activations
Your client expects everything from the night. Team Capture collects it from the whole field team into one album you can hand over.
Read it