CompanyCam alternative
Built for job sites. You are running events.
CompanyCam is a serious product and contractors rely on it. It is built around a job, priced per person, and sold to a trade that is not yours. If you are a brand team collecting photos at events, both of those things matter.
Being fair about it
CompanyCam is genuinely good at its job.
Photos tied to a project, timestamped, annotated, and defensible months later in a dispute. If you need a documentation record, use it. We do not do that and we are not going to pretend otherwise.
The per-seat price is the real difference.
Their published Crew plan is $119 a month for three users, then $29 for each extra user, billed annually. Core is $63 a month for one user. That is fine when every seat is a staff member billing hours. It is punishing when the people you want on the app are part-time staff working one night.
Side by side
The differences that actually change your week.
| CompanyCam | Team Capture | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Contractors documenting a job | Brand and marketing teams at events |
| Organised around | A project or property | Events, plus, on Team, albums that fill themselves from a sentence you write |
| Who does the filing | The person taking the photo picks the project | On Team, nobody. The AI files each photo by when, where and what is in it |
| Pricing | Per person, per month | Flat per workspace, never per person |
| A 25-person team | About $757 a month on the Crew plan, billed annually | $99 a month, or $199 with the AI filing and search |
| Part-time and casual staff | Each one costs another seat | Included in the plan, so adding somebody on the night costs nothing |
| What you get out | Job documentation and reports | Full-resolution photos to publish, and on Team, found by describing them |
Checked against public information on 27 September 2026.
Where it stops working
You want everyone taking photos, not a chosen few.
The moment a tool charges per head, somebody decides who does not get it, and theirs are exactly the photos you wanted. Our price does not move when you add the whole team.
Your unit of work is a night, not a property.
Albums are events: a launch, a game day, a tasting. On Team you can also describe a subject in a sentence, like photos of our bottles, and that album collects them from every event, including the ones next year.
You are publishing, not proving.
What you need is a full-resolution photo headed for a feed or a print ad, and, on Team, the ability to find it again by what is in it. Not a record for a claim.
Which one you want
If it has to hold up in a dispute, use CompanyCam.
If a photo has to hold up as evidence about a job, CompanyCam is the right tool. If the photos are going out on your channels next week and half the people taking them are part-time, per-seat pricing is buying you something you do not need.
Start free trialRelated
Who asks this question
Collecting photos across every location
Every location runs events and shoots them. Head office sees almost none of it. Team Capture collects every location into one account.
Read itPhoto collection for agencies running activations
Your client expects everything from the night. Team Capture collects it from the whole field team into one album you can hand over.
Read it