Greenfly alternative

Built for leagues. You are a brand with a calendar.

Greenfly is the serious platform in this category and it is not close. It is also built around rights holders, athletes and sponsors, sold by quote, and scaled for organisations with a content operation. If none of those words describe you, most of what you would be buying is not for you.

Request access See pricing

Being fair about it

Greenfly is the category leader and we are not pretending otherwise.

Over forty leagues and five hundred teams, including work across the NBA, NFL and MLB, and a real-time content partnership with Getty Images. If you are a rights holder moving content between athletes, sponsors and broadcasters at speed, that is the job they built the company around and they are the best at it.

It also does the trip we do not do at all.

Greenfly’s signature move is pushing social-ready content back out to athletes so they post it to their own followers, and organising the pile automatically with image and video recognition. We collect. We do not distribute to a talent network and we have no AI tagging. That is a real difference and it is not in our favour.

Side by side

The differences that actually change your week.

	Greenfly	Team Capture
Built for	Leagues, teams and rights holders	A brand or marketing team running its own events
The core loop	Collect, auto-organise, then distribute out to athletes, sponsors and broadcasters	Collect what your own staff shot, into one album per event
Who is shooting	Athletes, club photographers, media crews	Your staff, on the phones they already carry
Organising the pile	AI image and video recognition	You tag it. There is no AI layer yet
Published price	None. Sold by quote	$0 to $499 a month, on the pricing page
What a small team was quoted	Around $40,000 a year, asked in 2025	$990 a year on Starter
Time to start	A sales conversation	Request access, then hand out a join code
Smallest sensible customer	An organisation with a content operation	Five people and one event

Checked against public information on 21 August 2026.

Where it stops working

You are not a rights holder.

The product assumes athletes with followings, sponsors with entitlements and broadcasters with deadlines. A drinks brand running twelve tastings a year has none of those, and most of the platform is addressing a problem it does not have.

You cannot start on Tuesday.

No published price means a call, a scope and a quote before anyone uploads a photo. That is normal for enterprise software and it is the right process for a league. It is a strange amount of process for wanting the photos from Thursday’s launch. For scale: a small team that asked in 2025, trying to solve this exact problem, came back with a quote of around $40,000 a year. That is one quote for one scope and not a published rate — yours would be different — but it tells you which shelf the product sits on.

You want the collecting half, not the distribution machine.

A large part of what Greenfly does happens after the content exists, getting it to the people who will publish it. If your problem is that four hundred photos were taken and you received eleven, that is the earlier half.

Which one you want

Athletes and sponsors: Greenfly. Staff and events: Team Capture.

If you are a league, a club, or anyone whose content has to reach athletes and sponsors on a deadline, Greenfly is the right platform and Team Capture is not a replacement for it. If you are a brand team who just wants the photos your own people took at your own event, you would be buying a content operation to solve a collection problem.

Request access

Collecting photos on game day

A dozen staff across a stadium, a sponsor expecting content by Monday, and no signal in the concourse. Team Capture collects what everyone shoots into one album.

Read it

Photo collection for agencies running activations

Your client expects everything from the night. Team Capture collects it from the whole field team into one album you can hand over.